Doesn’t matter if there are other items on the menu
You would say that, because that proves your argument wrong. You’re literally saying McDonald’s isn’t cheaper because they stock the McCrispy. What about when they didn’t stock the McCrispy? Are we just not able to compare McDonald’s menu to chick-fil-a’s at that point?
You don’t go saying Apple has cheaper products than Dell because Apple sells a mouse that is 1/10 the cost of a Dell PC.
Nice analogy to derail from the actual conversation. Now we have to debate the accuracy of your analogy instead of the topic at hand.
Because it’s not a comparable sandwich, it is a value item.
McCrispy is literally McDonald’s answer to the Chick Fil A and Popeye’s craze from a while ago.
Right. And chick-fil-a has no value items.
You’d have a point if Mcdonald’s removed their McChicken for the McCrispy, but they didn’t so you don’t.
Well the argument is that Chick Fil A is not at the same price point as other fast food restaurants. I proved they were.
Doesn’t matter if there are other items on the menu, the price points for comparable sandwiches are the same. Hell, Chick Fil As was cheaper.
You don’t go saying Apple has cheaper products than Dell because Apple sells a mouse that is 1/10 the cost of a Dell PC.
No you didn’t, lmao.
You would say that, because that proves your argument wrong. You’re literally saying McDonald’s isn’t cheaper because they stock the McCrispy. What about when they didn’t stock the McCrispy? Are we just not able to compare McDonald’s menu to chick-fil-a’s at that point?
Nice analogy to derail from the actual conversation. Now we have to debate the accuracy of your analogy instead of the topic at hand.