silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-216 days agoCost of emissions from five major Australian resource companies more than $900bn, study finds; US researchers link BHP, Rio Tinto, Santos, Whitehaven Coal and Woodside Energy to specific climate harmswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square3linkfedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-linkCost of emissions from five major Australian resource companies more than $900bn, study finds; US researchers link BHP, Rio Tinto, Santos, Whitehaven Coal and Woodside Energy to specific climate harmswww.theguardian.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-216 days agomessage-square3linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSpicyLizards@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 days agoHope so, but politicians subsidising coal companies (definitely not for personal benefit) is the standard here. Environmental science is denied, and even for the non far-right parties, background deals ruin progress (looking at you albo).
minus-squareHanrahan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 days agoCould have voted Green, voted for shit lite instead, what a debacle. https://slrpnk.net/post/21579845
Hope so, but politicians subsidising coal companies (definitely not for personal benefit) is the standard here. Environmental science is denied, and even for the non far-right parties, background deals ruin progress (looking at you albo).
Could have voted Green, voted for shit lite instead, what a debacle.
https://slrpnk.net/post/21579845