• mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand. What exactly is the complaint here? That they’re over charging or charging at all?

    Or is this just bandwagon hate on a common and ancient business practice?

    Because there is nothing immoral or unethical about having multiple rental property.

    And don’t give me this shit about how they’re evil for over charging. The middle class holds all the power all we’re lacking is organization and education.

    • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because there is nothing immoral or unethical about having multiple rental property.

      You’re charging someone for you doing nothing so they can have a basic need to survive. It’s very immoral

      If you’re gonna try to defend an immoral act with

      Or is this just bandwagon hate on a common and ancient business practice?

      Then Ill assume you’re pro-slavery and move on

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Charging for housing isn’t immoral just because it’s a necessity. By that logic, grocery stores are immoral for charging for food, and doctors are immoral for charging for healthcare. Property ownership and rental markets exist because providing and maintaining housing costs money. If your argument is that the system should be reformed, fine, let’s talk solutions. But calling all landlords inherently immoral is just lazy thinking.

        Also your comment on slavery is offensive which I believe is the only reason you added it which makes you sound even more stupid.

        • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also your comment on slavery is offensive

          So you know your argument works perfectly for slavery, can see how it applies and are embarrassed enough being called out on it to be offended, but not to rethink yourself? That response is actually why I included it: easy way to tell you’re not to be taken seriously

          • mechoman444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh, please. Get off your intellectual high horse. Your ability to string coherent words together doesn’t mean you actually know anything. All you’ve done is throw out a false equivalency and some hyperbole. I present arguments, and you respond with pseudo-intellectual gibberish. The people who take you seriously are the same ones who fart into wine glasses, idiots. I’m so tired of you hipster fucks on Lemmy. You talk about things you don’t understand and convince yourselves you’re enlightened. You’re just short-sighted trash wrapped in $100 words and YouTube rhetoric.

            • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              All you’ve done is throw out a false equivalency and some hyperbole

              No, I pointed out that your main argument in your original comment was terrible as it was an equally valid defense for slavery, figuring that if you got butthurt at being called out on it that you weren’t worth engaging mentally with, as anyone of any decency would see that and go “oh fuck dude maybe I should rethink at least that part of my stance”, it’s literally what I said in my comment ffs

              you respond with pseudo-intellectual gibberish

              My point, non-intellectual as it may be (like basically everything I do), wasn’t gibberish to anyone with basic reading comprehension