psychothumbs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoThey Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1495arrow-down17
arrow-up1488arrow-down1external-linkThey Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.www.nytimes.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·1 day agoWhat? He went on Trump’s sub and tried to get them to like him by editing their comments… If that’s what you mean. Weird way to phrase it.
minus-squareLka1988@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-212 hours agoStill a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database. If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoI’m sorry that you completely missed the point of my comment
minus-squareLka1988@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoNo I understood just fine, but that precedent is a far bigger issue than whatever side of the fence you sit on.
What?
He went on Trump’s sub and tried to get them to like him by editing their comments…
If that’s what you mean. Weird way to phrase it.
Still a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database.
If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?
I’m sorry that you completely missed the point of my comment
No I understood just fine, but that precedent is a far bigger issue than whatever side of the fence you sit on.