• febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This is insane. The Soviet Union had by far the biggest losses during WW2 in the fight against Nazism. Around eight to ten million soldiers died during the war, and if you add the civilian casualties on top of that, the estimates sit at around 24 million people. Many of those people were Russian and Belorussian. Let them mourn their dead. It doesn’t matter that the Russian ambassador is a prick or not. I think it speaks volumes when the country that started WW2 does shit like this and it’s not okay.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Russian representatives aren’t being banned because of the behaviour of this ambassador. They’re being banned becaue they are expected to misuse the publicity of an event where Ukrainians - the Soviet republic with the second-highest military and civilian casualties - will also be present

      You’ve got two parts of the former Soviet Union fighting a brutal war against each other. You probably can’t invite both sides to the same event and expect it to go okay. Which side do you invite? The one that didn’t start the problem

      • solo@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not too sure how effective this is tho, as a solution.

        It seems to me like a diplomatic escalation in the sense that banning the Russian ambassador from attending this commemoration event gives Putin something to instrumentalise anyways, at least for internal consumption. In the same time this move does not apply any kind of actual pressure on Russia. So I honestly don’t know what good can come out of this move.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          If Putin is going to make use of it either way, it seems to me like you might as well pick the option that makes it more likely for the event to go ahead without incident. It’s not like Germany is burning any good will with Russia here, there isn’t any to burn

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          So in the name of civility we can’t take proactive steps to limit a belligerent country’s ability to cause shit?

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t think you get to play the “well you started ww2 card” when you’re trying your damndest to start ww3 lmao

      • DillDough@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Especially since Russia was an ally to Nazi Germany, and would have happily followed that path to the end if Hitler hadn’t turned on them.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        On the other hand this gives Russia exactly what they want, they get to play the victim.