TBF the layout is pretty confusing.

There are many different ways to be a stupid asshole, and you can even do it while at the exact opposite end of the political spectrum.

Depends what you mean by “traditional worldview”. I’ll go ahead and say young earth creationism shows a lack of openness to objective reality when it’s not personally convenient.

In the context I mean, what gets justified with tradition is behavior like putting on a fake persona when dating, pushing boundaries, disregarding the rights of strangers around them and generally being an entitled, eventually controlling dickwad. They’ll say that’s what men have always done, and boys will be boys or whatever, but I’m certain nobody had to “twist their arm”.

When I see one of those dudes dragging a girl around, I have to wonder if she’s chasing a kink. That’s not how you go about it, if so. 50 Shades of Grey was fiction.

Just based on what I see women doing around me all the time, there were probably some warning signs. Looking for a dude that’s “traditional” or whatever is asking for a dude that’s going to see you like a form of livestock. It’s partly a politics thing, but largely an assholes thing.

41% of young men support Tate versus just 12% of young women.

WTF those are both shockingly high.

Depends what OP meant by “problems like this”. The specific problem in the headline sounds new; teachers were teachers when I was growing up.

I would actually recommend trans people don’t start pointless fights on the internet, as well.

Judges hear the case that’s brought, not the agenda of the groups that bring things. They were even at pains to say this isn’t a victory for either side, probably because they saw the media circus coming.

It might be damaging. I don’t know where this goes next, although I’m sure you’ll share some ideas. It’s questionable that the legislation was written that way in the first place, but I guess it was 2010 and we should just be glad trans people are in there. That’s really all I have to say about that part.

From what I’ve read, it’s about the definition of “women” in the interpretation of the Equality Act 2010, which specifically and separately mentions protections for transpeople. Basically, the document would be rendered very confusing otherwise, and they’re lawyers first.

When I heard it was unanimous, I knew there had to be more to the story. Unfortunately it’s the kind of context that doesn’t fit in headlines.

Yeah, not a good look when America is doing the same thing as a way of disappearing people.

Not surprised. The level of European alarm about the Russian threat being real has been greater than what could have been sustained without there being secret direct evidence.

Here’s hoping when he does that and immediately starts to lose, he doesn’t decide to end the world.