If the state can prove that he undoubtedly did it, he should be punished.

If the state’s case is weak enough to leave some lingering doubts, he should walk.

The defense doesn’t have to prove anything. Their job is to cast doubt on whatever the state claims.

That’s how our justice system works.

Are any of the photos from the crime scene?

Because if you find a guy who matches “photo of guy getting coffee”, you still don’t have evidence that he’s a killer. You have evidence that he got some coffee.

What does that have to do with Lebanon?

Imagine if Mexico launched rockets at the US in 2003 to protest our pointless invasion of Iraq. It would not end well for Mexico.