Both parties are in the pocket of the ownership class.
The Democrats seriously would rather see the republic fall to a pro corpo dictatorship, than do anything to address wealth inequality.

Just days ago didn’t he lament how terrible autism is, how destructive it is to whole families? Now he wants to take support away from those families? Being wrong is one thing, this is self contradictory nonsense.

The headline seems to imply something wrong is happening.

The options they got when hired finally matured, now they can sell them. With the share price cratering for things they can’t control (Musk being a dick) who wouldn’t just cash out? It’s the only thing worth doing in that situation.

He’s in a different room than we are.

Of course if one truly can’t afford it, paying for search can seem a luxury.

However I would argue as a counterpoint; If there’s any online service one would consider paying for, it should be search. Search is most literally our “front page to the internet”. It’s our first stop in any quest for information. Even the founders of Google knew early on, that putting adds in search creates a perverse incentive against the best results, favoring instead worse results, so people perform more searches, creating more opportunities to show people adds.

$5 a month isn’t much to know your query will give the results you want, instead of the results advertisers want.

That’s not really at issue here.
This isn’t the government deciding what art is objectionable, and arresting those who play music they don’t like. This is a private company deciding what it wants to host in it’s library, that it curates, it pays license fees for, and sells subscriptions too. Ye or any Nazi absolutely has the right to make and sell any music they want. They however don’t have the right to force another company to sell their music for them.

Most negotiations are based on vibes.
It’s why I hate (and often refuse) to negotiate.

It surprising how much push back, and how many down votes I got from people here, when I said that more than a year ago.
I’m glad now in hind sight it’s apparently obvious to everyone.

In a way they are.
You see, the weather radar stations collect data.
Data used in the manufacture of… Knowledge Bombs

Do you mean Reddit the company, or the Reddit the community?

I think the answers are “No”, and “A little. It often gets deleted when mentioned.”

They got shit for being stupid and using a public FOSS app that skirts the law.

It makes a kind of sense they would switch to something worse, because of the aforementioned stupid part.

This is newsworthy because Trump just obliterated half of all money in Hollywood.

Did he? I thought this was something he just said. Did he sign an executive order or take any action to make it happen?

He says shit all the time, and actually tries to do less than 5% of it.

Sure I’ll accept I got all the details wrong. That doesn’t really matter to my point.
My point is that this is another example of him saying something so stupid, that it shouldn’t get any media coverage.

Then I think we have different ideas of what “Fight Back” means, and are talking past each other.

Another “Trump said” that should be ignored.

How would this even work? Tariffs function by holding the physical items in customs, until the tax is paid. But a licensing deal on a digital good, that can be transfered undetected over the internet, is impossible to teriff. You could tax it other ways, but 100% of what. The distribution license? The copyright?

I guarantee he hasn’t thought about any of this, and as such this mindless utterance a can be safely ignored.

But using those words you’d have to, to establish that it isn’t actually the father who was shot, but the 18 year old.

The terrible use commas comes from the terrible word choice. Rewriting the entire sentence would be the best option.

But 95% of the time he doesn’t take any action on what he says.
Then he actually does take action on things he never said anything about.

If you fight back against everything he says, you’ll exhaust yourself on so many things that don’t matter; You’ll completely miss many things that do. Which is in fact the strategy.

For example his personal crypto tokens. He never said anything about making his own tokens to launder bribes through. Then suddenly surprised everyone announcing a new company and tokens. If anyone in the world buys $25M worth, they’ll get a private sit down dinner to discuss whatever they want. That blatant clear corruption is important. And bullshit this is just a distraction.

Everyone needs to stop reporting on anything he just says. Instead, the media should exclusively focus on what he actually does. Did he issue any executive order about it? Did he instruct congress to do anything anything about it? No? Then I don’t give a shit, and neither should anyone else.

While your certainly sounds better with the word choice in the headline, it doesn’t reflect the actual facts of events.

“Father of an 18 year old,” establishes the father as the subject, and the 18 year old as a specifying factor. So the the rest of the sentence states, it was the father who was “fatally shot by Ohio police” and “charged with hitting and killing deputy”. It’s still unclear if it was the father or the deputy who was “with car”.

Where as my commas separate the facts accurately. Their strangeness comes from the extremely poor word choice and order of facts in the headline.

“Father of,” establishes the father as the subject. “18 year old fatally shot by Ohio police,” is together a single specifier. “charged with hitting and killing deputy,” states what happened to the father. And finally “, with car” is what the father used, to hit and kill the deputy.

Headlines aren’t usually written by journalists.
Especially at big shops like this.

And I hate golf.