I was speaking specifically about BEVs, since we are comparing to Tesla.

I think we are lacking reading comprehension skills.

Selling stock = taxable event, taxes (big or small).

Getting a loan against stock = no taxable event, zero taxes.

You pay less taxes on long term, but not no taxes. That’s why you take loans against it.

Insure the raft, problem solved!

Wait until you hear what they plan about EColi in vegetables.

As an EU citizen, I don’t really see it as “a problem” :D

Honda and Toyota are flopping HARD on EVs. Their EVs suck, like worst in the market suck. Hyundai / Kia are doing a great job, and VW is boring but okay (now after fixing the 3.0 software debacle).

I wish rivian and lucid had more funding, cause their cars are top notch, but the companies have growth pains.

That’s not why. The why is to avoid a taxable event.

That’s not how loans against stock work. If the share price reach a threshold the shares are automatically sold to cover the loan.

I know you can’t resist to whatabout some more, but the US is an ally of Russia since last November.

Yes

And state subsidies.

Alternative headline: Spain forces Israel to stockpile more bullets, Gazansooking nervous.

Space race 2.0!

A voted in by 77 million imbeciles and another ~70 million morons who didn’t vote against him.

Not everyone is so fortunate, some people have the good monitor, keyboard and chair at the office and a dining table at home.

Same here. I do 100% remote but many of our customers have hybrid models or even total freedom and some people choose to go tue-thu to the office. Especially younger people, without family, and living in smaller apartments in city centers (bad wfh setup, not enough space, roommates).

In communism the state has control of everything and everything is a monopoly.

When you see what they consider legal, I wonder what kind of twisted shit did they ask that the guy refused…

Because tariffs, duh!