

Fuck James Comey
well, yes… but. if the trump directed doj pursues a charge, its a serious 1st amendment challenge. we can all individually guess at motive, but another pillar may get publicly tested.
…just this guy, you know.
Fuck James Comey
well, yes… but. if the trump directed doj pursues a charge, its a serious 1st amendment challenge. we can all individually guess at motive, but another pillar may get publicly tested.
there is no “set” definition
👍 bread & circus about to get a whole lot circus-ier. wonder if they have the balls to charge?
oh, ffs! just call him a “imbecilic moron that will be ignored” and move on. tired of the attention paid to his every mental bowel movement.
how about an ad tailored precisely by your recent history - graphics/audio/content and all, delivered to you in different ways depending on how you are feeling at any given moment? an instant and dynamic money extraction machine shaping and shaped by your second by second stream of clicks and queries, completing the transformation of everyone into lab monkeys.
ai is already your online sig-o, friend, assistant, whatever, so…?
Before she was a judge, Dugan worked as a poverty attorney and executive director of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee.
well there’s her original sin! not defending the the powerful against the unwashed hordes.
❤️,seriously.
in typical trump fashion - take a dump on the desk and walk out of the room. shart of the deal!
I think that might actually help the doj by providing an accepted definition.
this will likely come down to the govts whimsical attempt to criminally define clearly amorphous (but protected) speech for its prosecutorial benefit. a criminal case should
looselose instantly up and down the courts. we may get a chance to test that.