Summary

Tesla reported its worst quarterly results in four years, with Q1 income down 71% and EV sales falling 13%.

Elon Musk vowed to refocus on Tesla amid backlash over his political role in the Trump Administration’s DOGE program, but analysts doubt his return will fix worsening issues.

Tesla faces eroding market share, failed products like the Cybertruck, and a coming 145% tariff on imported Chinese battery cells set to hammer the company’s battery pack business, one of the only bright spots last quarter.

Musk’s pivot to robotaxis and humanoid robots lacks credibility, and critics say Tesla has no compelling new EVs to revive growth.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tesla cannot be saved until and unless Musk sells his share of the company and completely divorces himself from it. Even that may not be enough, as the brand is so closely associated with Musk that his stain may not wash off, but it’s their only chance.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      90% of what is keeping Tesla’s value is the tech bro community’s absolute belief in Elmo. If he sold all of his shares the value of the stock would plummet to almost zero. Hell if he even just sold a moderately large portion of his shares the stock price would plummet dramatically. That’s why he’s always so reluctant to sell his stock and basically uses it to leverage loans.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          He actually had to sell some of his stock to pay taxes a couple of years ago. And when he did so it dramatically dropped the price of the stock. So no. There’s a rule in place that if you have a stock for X amount of time you do not have to pay taxes on it when you sell it.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You pay less taxes on long term, but not no taxes. That’s why you take loans against it.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I think we are lacking reading comprehension skills.

                Selling stock = taxable event, taxes (big or small).

                Getting a loan against stock = no taxable event, zero taxes.

                • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  And the more stock he has and the more it’s worth, the more money he can get from a loan based on it.

                  My point is still standing, the thing keeping him from selling his stock is not the taxes it’s the value of the stock.

                  This was literally proved when he sold some of his stock to pay off taxes that he owed. Bitching on twitter the entire time about it as well.

    • EstonianGuy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It will, it just takes a lot of years. Lets not forget that Hugo Boss and Volkswagen were nazi germany companies.

      They’re still quite popular even though one made military uniforms and the other vehicles.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        And that can really only begin with his departure from the company. And his divestment.

        A lot of people are going after Tesla because he owns a shit load of it and we want to bury him- not because we particularly care about Tesla.

        Once he’s gone from the company, then they can rebuild, it eh…. He has to leave first.