Apparently, Ukrainian drones pushed through and started a chain reaction.

Explosions reportedly continued for hours, and authorities evacuated nearby settlements. Initial reports indicate that the site, previously protected by one of Russia’s densest air defense networks, suffered catastrophic damage.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If Russia truly has fucked its entire workforce into conscription, they may have to pull forces off the frontlines in order to manufacture replacements for lost equipment and munitions.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I hope the shrapnel flew everywhere. Kudos to Ukrainian drone pilots. Fuck the Muscovites and their foreign supporters.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If Putler had any sense, he’d spend a fraction of his military budget on making nicotine patches available for free to his orcs. That would pay for itself in no time.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      These are the people who couldn’t be stopped drinking rocket fuel so a poison additive had to be included, the fuck is a patch gonna do?

  • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Can we have links to more reputable, known news sites please? Never heard of that one. Here’s the BBC.

    Russia’s military blamed the blast on ammunition which had detonated after the storage building caught fire due to a “violation of safety requirements”.

    Huh, I suppose maybe a drone-sized violation?

    • PurpleSkull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Have seen euromaidanpress articles before, I think they’re legit if not a bit sensationalist and obviously very pro-Ukraine.

      And of course Russia blames a smoooooking incident. There’s this one Russian guy who just smokes everywhere he shouldn’t. Munition storages, aviation bases, flagship Moskva…

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Why am I now picturing a chain smoking Forrest Gump? “Life is like a pack of cigarettes, you never know what’s gonna blow up.”

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The safety violation will be that the ammunition wasn’t stored in the proper storage bunkers and was therefore vulnerable to an attack setting off the whole lot.

      …and then an attack did just that.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I think it’s more that the British Press in general is pretty political, heavy on the spin and hence one of the least trusted in Europe by the locals themselves.

          When it comes to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine - which is very politically and geostrategically significant for the UK government - the level and direction of the bias of the BBC is no different from the Euromaidan Press hence for those who think the latter is not a “serious source”, the former is also not a “serious source”.

          Mind you, on different subjects which are not related to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine (such as the Israeli Genocide in Gaza) I fully expect the Euromaidan Press is often less biased (on this specific example, significantly so) than the BBC.

          Just because the BBC is posh doesn’t mean they’re honest (in fact from my own experience living in the UK, posh more often than not means fake. manipulative and dishonest)

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure competent militaries store their munitions in networks of dozens if not hundreds of earthen bunkers per site, specifically so shit like this can’t happen.

    264 kilotons is a fuckload of bombs.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Competent being the key word in that sentence, and not an accurate one based on the last few years of intel.

    • perestroika@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Competent ones, I think they do.

      Possible explanations:

      • yet another time, someone had set money aside for personal use, consequently the bunkers had doors made of plywood or roofing tin :)

      • arrival of drones was timed to match the loading / unloading of an ammunition train (that’s when even competent militaries have to bring their stuff out)

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It could hold that much, but according to Ukraine it was 105000 tons that exploded. Huge success though.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      They may not have enough manpower to guard a more distributed site, especially if they’re afraid of internal groups seizing some of it.

        • perestroika@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          If you think of the fill percentage, I think that’s too optimistic, since they’re in a war. There is constant demand. However, even 50% would be an extremely big amount, and relieve Ukrainians from a lot of pressure (last year, when a similar thing happened in Toropets, it had effects on the front within weeks). This time, from the videos I saw, there was enough to keep detonating for a long time.

          Whatever the fill percentage and loss percentage, the site is closed for a long time - if something remains, it cannot be reached, it has to be examined and re-certified. But more likely, very little will remain.

          In the coming days, satellite photos will tell what the situation is.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Kirzhach is on the far side of Moscow from Ukraine. Did the drones fly over Moscow to reach it, or did they take a longer route?

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s the fun part of going to war with an adversary that was formerly a part of your empire: they have A LOT of people that can convincingly pass as your nationals - not to mention, there’s a small but meaningful percentage of your own citizens that are going to be sympathetic enough (due to family, social, and cultural connections) to that adversary that they’d be willing to act on their behalf for stuff like this.

          • Someone@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The American government has already shown they’re happy to round up people who look like "foreign enemies"whether they are or not. If your enemy has almost the exact same demographics, all of a sudden there’s probable cause to detain anyone (I know, it’s not like they care about any due process but everything else feels like we’re in make believe land anyways).

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            54
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            As an American, it is utterly insane to me that there’s a good number of Americans that are just like “huh yeah I guess we’re gonna bomb Canada to make them do what we want”.

            Then again, there’s a lot of utterly insane things happening these days.

            A lot of my countrymen are gonna be finding out about Type II “sorry” if we try any military adventurism. And I’m sure Greenlanders would welcome an expeditionary force of Finns, considering their rich and storied experience (5-6.5:1 KD ratio; ~5:1 overall casualty ratio, without even considering the Continuation War).

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Type II “sorry”

              Love this, and now that I see your username I find this quote has a Banksian quality to it.

              Type I: I’m sorry
              Type II: You’ll be sorry

              • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                It is absolutely an Iain M Banks reference (and thank you for noticing <3). I identify as a GSV.

                Type II (alternate): said cheekily, immediately after finding a loophole in the Geneva Convention

                • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  GOU Type II Sorry
                  ROU Geneva Suggestions
                  LOU Trench Raid
                  GCU I Never Agreed to a Truce

  • eronth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What, like, percent of stored munitions would this likely be? How impactful of a destruction is it?

    • Metz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It’s hard to find reliable data about that. The last good information is from 2022 and says that Russia has stored around 1 million tons of ammunition. That would mean Ukraine just wiped out 26% of everything Russia had.

      However, since it is very likely that Russia has produced a lot more since the war began, it’s hard to tell how much they actually lost today.

      The only other number I could find was one that says that each day Russia uses around 26000 rounds of ammunition (artillery).

      And since I’m a lazy fuck that is already lying in bed and I only have my smartphone here, I’ll let AI do the estimates and calculations.

      Under the premise that most things in that depot was artillery ammo, and we roughly know the weight of a round and as said how much they use per day we can estimate they burn through 1218 tons of ammunition per day.

      That would mean Ukraine just destroyed around 220 days of ammunition.

      But as said, that’s just a wild guess based on some very vague numbers that I don’t have double checked now.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ukraine themselves reports it at 105ktons of munitions destroyed. And honestly, I trust their remote intel better than russias direct intel on how much it was. Hehe.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Wasn’t it around 10.000 rounds of artillery at the start of thf full scale invasion and now it’s a bit lower like 5-6.000?

        • Metz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That may very well be. Ukraine managed to destroy quite a lot depots already, as far as I remember. And Russia had already problems of keeping up either way because of lack of specific resources, I think.

          Something along that line. This display is too small and my fingers too fat to actually check that right now.