cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/61295662
Germany’s next chancellor signaled his willingness to provide Ukraine with long-range Taurus cruise missiles, marking a potential shift in Berlin’s military support as Kyiv continues to press for more high-precision weapons to hit deep into Russian-held territory, The Financial Times reported on April 13.
Friedrich Merz, leader of the center-right Christian Democrats (CDU) and the expected successor to Olaf Scholz said that Germany should participate in supplying Taurus missiles if a joint decision is reached with European allies.
“Our European partners are already supplying cruise missiles,” Merz said. “The British are doing it, the French are doing it, and the Americans are doing it anyway.”
“This must be jointly agreed. And if it is agreed, then Germany should take part,” he added.
[…]
What’s with this article’s image making it look like Merz has a halo? If Jesus was alive he’d yeet that guy straight out of the Bundestag
Making more money with death. Great.
Better than letting Ruzzia make money with war AND win
True, they would make so much money if China does not trade with them… But diplomacy does not work, right? That’s why we don’t try it and it is not us or rather our proletariat that is sacrificed to protect our capital interest and a nation freed from Russia by Nazis using the slogan by the fascists. And yes China is interested, which is why they initiated talkes, but the “peacekeeping west” ignored.
It’s as close to perfectly ethical as weapon sales can be. Ukraine defending itself is an open and shut case for a just war. Particularly so because Ukraine does not target civilian homes etc.
No. It is not. Ukrainian proletarians kill Russian proletarians and the other way around. Surely, Russia invaded the Ukraine. And they target civilian infrastructure. However, the EU has an interest in the war continuing to justify armament and to export capital to the Ukrain. That is why the EU countries did not do anything when China and Brasil wanted to stop the war by diplomacy. And that is the only way: China needs to perusade Russia into ending the war. If there really was a moral reason to help the Ukraine defend itself than the same would be applied to Palastine whoever somehow here the one g3n0c1ding is aided.
And that is the only way: China needs to perusade Russia into ending the war.
There’s another way - Ukraine beats the shit out of Russia, which they currently do. Russia’s reserves of the soviet union are drained fast and they cant produce weapons of war quickly enough, let alone provide more soldiers for the meat grinder.
Arming Ukraine to the teeth to enable it to fend for itself is 100% the right choice.
Interestinly the people claiming this also claimed that years ago and are the same people claiming the EU has to rearm as Russia might attack NATO countries.
I don’t get your point. Russia still might attack NATO countries and we should’ve rearmed years ago.
Then explain why? You can’t even know in how far the military of said EU country is equipped, as that is classified for obvious reasons. Stop galling for those obvious war propaganda and read a book or start with this article: https://kritikpunkt.com/2025/03/29/mythos-aufruestung/
Can you think of a more just war?
-
Russia promises territorial integrity in exchange for giving up nuclear weapons.
-
Ukraine says yes and gives up nuclear weapons.
-
Russia and Ukraine agree and sign a treaty.
Russia invades Ukraine?!?!
I personally can not think of a more just war.
It’s a defensive war against an imperialist aggressor who signed a treaty promising not to invade in exchange for giving up nuclear weapons.
Open and shut case.
Where did you disproof any of my claims? This war could have been over long ago without the Proletariat of more than two nations being decimated. But this would stand in the way of capital interest, which is why the peace talks of China and Brazil were ignored by the west. If you want to argue then address my point please.
-
Es geht durch die Welt ein Geflüster…
