Original post: https://bsky.app/profile/ssg.dev/post/3lmuz3nr62k26

Email from Bluesky in the screenshot:

Hi there,

We are writing to inform you that we have received a formal request from a legal authority in Turkey regarding the removal of your account associated with the following handle (@carekavga.bsky.social) on Bluesky.

The legal authority has claimed that this content violates local laws in Turkey. As a result, we are required to review the request in accordance with local regulations and Bluesky’s policies.

Following a thorough review, we have determined that the content in question violates local laws in Turkey, as outlined in the legal request. In compliance with these legal provisions, we have restricted access to your account for users.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Assuming you are serious:

      Bluesky is … arguably ‘federated’, but it is centralized, not decentralized.

      https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20241128-bluesky-decentralization

      Their model (AT Protocol) relies on a central, authoritative … ‘Relay’, that all ‘federated’ users and posts on federated PDS (personal data servers) must go through, to actually reach the ‘AppView’, ie, what all other people/users can actually see.

      So, this is not a many to many, tangled spider web of connections, the way lemmy, and other parts of the actual fediverse are.

      It is a top down hierarchy, a pyramid.

      And Bluesky runs the Relay, the chokepoint.

      If Bluesky cuts off the PDS your account is on, everyone on it is now gone.

      The actual fediverse, Mastadon, Lemmy, etc, runs on ActivityPub.

      In that model… every instance is essentially self contained, and every instance that is federated communicates with every other instance that is federated.

      Each instance can decide what other instances they want to federate with… and users on each instance can personally block even more other users, communities, or entire instances if they choose to, but that only effects what that particular user sees.

      That is what you call decentralized, approaching, or also having elements of being ‘distributed’.

      To bring up an example without getting into the drama that led to it:

      The ‘Tankie Triad’ of ml, lemmygrad and hexbear have had a number of other instances defederate from them.

      But, there are also a good number of instances that have not done so.

      So that means if your account is on hexbear… you can’t see or post on an instamce that has blocked your instance.

      But, if you (a hexbear…ian?), post on a neutral instance… users on that neutral instance will see the post.

      But but, if a user from an instance that has defederated from hexbear goes to to the neutral instance… they will not see the hexbearian’s post.

      This sounds complicated, and it is, but … thats the whole point of a decentralized system. It is more complex in the abstract… but the entire system ends up being more robust, more adaptable, more customizable… without a central authority in direct control of the entire system.

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      For those who don’t know, Bluesky isn’t really federated. The only way to host a non-Bluesky instance required 1TB of storage in July 2024, and 5 TB of storage in Nov 2024. Could be way more than that now.

      You basically have to be a company to federate into the ATProto (Bluesky) ecosystem. You can’t just “stand up an instance”.

      Lots of detail: https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

      (I know you’ve already realized that you were conflating Mastodon with Bluesky, I’m putting this here for others who come along so they can get the facts).

        • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          yeah the DM system is something completely exclusive to their official servers and that they just rolled up without caring at all about trying to keep up the pretense of wanting to build something decentralized.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            My Jellyfin server is 6 times that… And my gaming PC is double that… Seriously, this person thinks 5TB is a lot? Don’t we have SD Cards/Flash Drives this big now? I’d be WAY more concerned about the bandwidth requirements.

            Edit: laughing my ass off at the downvotes. Yes, my server has 30TB. Yes my PC has around 12TB. It wasn’t expensive or hard. The hard drives in my Jellyfin are NAS drives… Bunch of people acting like you need quantum computers to run a node lmfao. Storage space is easy. It’s the networking and bandwidth part that’s hard. So yeah, complaining that 5TB of storage puts it out of reach of the average person when one 12tb NAS drive cost $200? Just bitching. Plain and simple.

            • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              its still not a small amount of storage. and no, there’s still not really sd cards or flash drives bigger than 1tb, but obviously even if there were and they were super cheap, that would still never suffice as server storage. plus, if you’re hosting a node you’d want at least 4 or 5 times that storage to use a raid 5 or 6 array + at least one onsite backup, and one off-site backup.

              now we’re talking thousands of dollars in equipment just for storage, not the actual server itself, internet connection, etc.

              • fishos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                You literally just described my Jellyfin, minus the raid because I don’t feel like setting it up. Think all in all I’m down about $1200 for it. Not thousands. You do realized a 12TB NAS drive is $200, right? Only reason my build cost as much is because I have a few 2TB ssds in there which were just leftovers from the PC anyways. I could’ve done it all for $500.

                Off-site backup isn’t required. Nice, but not required at all. In the literal sense, you don’t need it. It’s good to have, but an extra.

                So yeah, 5TB, literally the only metric I was discussing, isn’t much. Maybe in the future the person should say all the nuance and not “5TB is unreasonable for the average person”. It’s not. Plain and simple.

              • Anivia@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                there’s still not really sd cards or flash drives bigger than 1tb

                There are actually 2tb microSD cards now, and 4tb flash drives